+ 3

Can you help me.

Armenian schoolchildren have created a robot that moves along the top of the rectangular network of nxm sizes. At the same time it can move, right top up-right    Your task is to find the number of possible roads that will reach the point (n, m) of the robot (0,0). Input Details:    The n and m are the natural numbers Exit data    The number of roads that should not exceed 10^18 should be deducted.

5th Apr 2018, 8:10 PM
Tiran Araqelyan
Tiran Araqelyan - avatar
18 Answers
+ 2
I'm doing tests for any scenarios you can think of, but I can't find any pattern in my output which could further reduce my algorithm complexity for n and m. It's so frustrating.
6th Apr 2018, 5:24 PM
Timon Paßlick
+ 1
As a hint, I will say that for every move that gets you one more up, and one more right, there are 3 ways of doing that: top,right right,top up-right So, if starting from the bottom-left corner, if n=m then there are 3*n ways of doing it. And for the general case there are 3*min(n,m) + |n-m| ways, where |x| is the absolute value of x. So 3*min(n,m) + |n-m| is your answer. To add on this, you can see that if the values of n and m are interchanged the answer does not change. This is because the number of paths from (0,0) to (n,m) is the same as the number of paths from (0,0) to (m,n), meaning that it is symmetric across the main diagonal, as the formula suggests. I leave it for you to check why I've chosen to add |n-m|.
5th Apr 2018, 9:24 PM
Bebida Roja
Bebida Roja - avatar
+ 1
I would like to know where I've gone wrong
6th Apr 2018, 7:30 AM
Bebida Roja
Bebida Roja - avatar
+ 1
Nevermind, I've notoced it.
6th Apr 2018, 8:22 AM
Bebida Roja
Bebida Roja - avatar
+ 1
Your integer type for the result needs at least 60 bits, excluding the sign bit.
6th Apr 2018, 2:02 PM
Timon Paßlick
+ 1
You could solve that recursively.
6th Apr 2018, 2:14 PM
Timon Paßlick
+ 1
If m equals 0, there is one way. If m equals 1, there are 1 + n * 2 ways.
6th Apr 2018, 2:22 PM
Timon Paßlick
+ 1
In general, we have 1 + (n - nRobot) * 2 ways to increment m while still being able to reach (n, m).
6th Apr 2018, 2:27 PM
Timon Paßlick
+ 1
There is at least one way to solve this problem.
6th Apr 2018, 2:46 PM
Timon Paßlick
+ 1
There are at least m * (1 + n * 2) ways to solve this problem.
6th Apr 2018, 2:50 PM
Timon Paßlick
+ 1
//correct but SLOW C++ code #include <cstdint> using Int = std::int64_t; Int ways(const Int n, const Int m) { if (n == 0 || m == 0) return 1; Int result = ways(n, m - 1); for (Int new_n = 0; new_n != n; ++new_n) result += 2 * ways(new_n, m - 1); return result; }
6th Apr 2018, 3:53 PM
Timon Paßlick
+ 1
Here is some output for squares (side length to way count): 0: 1 1: 3 2: 13 3: 63 4: 321 5: 1683 6: 8989 7: 48639 8: 265729 9: 1462563 10: 8097453 11: 45046719 12: 251595969 13: 1409933619 14: 7923848253 15: 44642381823 16: 252055236609 17: 1425834724419
6th Apr 2018, 5:01 PM
Timon Paßlick
+ 1
If m is a constant, as n approaches infinity, ways(n, m)' approaches one and ways(n, m) approaches infinity.
6th Apr 2018, 5:57 PM
Timon Paßlick
+ 1
Why is my answer wrong?
7th Apr 2018, 1:14 PM
Timon Paßlick
+ 1
Give me two natural numbers n and m where ways(n, m) returns the wrong value.
7th Apr 2018, 1:57 PM
Timon Paßlick
+ 1
You can't just claim that something is wrong without proving it or pointing out why you think so.
7th Apr 2018, 2:55 PM
Timon Paßlick
0
thanks for replac,but your facts dont true.
6th Apr 2018, 6:40 AM
Tiran Araqelyan
Tiran Araqelyan - avatar
0
there isnt own right anwser
7th Apr 2018, 1:14 PM
Tiran Araqelyan
Tiran Araqelyan - avatar