+ 16

Could someone please tell us what is wrong with this question?😂

https://www.sololearn.com/post/470210/?ref=app

19th Jul 2020, 12:27 PM
ProfOduola🙏🇳🇬
ProfOduola🙏🇳🇬 - avatar
11 Answers
+ 8
Answer will be 1 only! Did you get it wrong? Ohhh!! Now I understood what you wanted to say!! If a person doesn't know that 4 is not less than 3, then also he/she can get the correct answer! 😂😂😂😂😂😂 ~ swim ~ Paul Jacobs he is not having a conceptual problem! He is just saying that both the cases will give the same output then what's the point of if else statement
19th Jul 2020, 12:41 PM
Namit Jain
Namit Jain - avatar
+ 8
~ swim ~ , here is my thought on the matter , please 🙏😂 https://code.sololearn.com/chf655aABoxS/?ref=app
19th Jul 2020, 12:53 PM
ProfOduola🙏🇳🇬
ProfOduola🙏🇳🇬 - avatar
+ 6
Yes, this question is going for else condition as 3 is less than 4 and condition under else will result in 1
19th Jul 2020, 12:36 PM
Raj Kalash Tiwari
Raj Kalash Tiwari - avatar
+ 5
https://www.sololearn.com/learn/JUMP_LINK__&&__Python__&&__JUMP_LINK/2280/ 'and' goes before 'or'. Think that is part of the solution.
19th Jul 2020, 12:40 PM
Paul
Paul - avatar
+ 4
madeline I think 'or' has more precedence than 'and' Sonu Kittu MiKoLa🔥3L17.4L16.2.5k=>L18.🙏IDLE already knows that 😅😅😂😂 See his profile! You will be impressed by his work!
19th Jul 2020, 10:51 PM
Namit Jain
Namit Jain - avatar
0
Answr will be one just remeber that order of evalution i.e "not and or " order of evaluation
19th Jul 2020, 6:45 PM
Kittu
Kittu - avatar
0
☹️☹️☹️☹️☹️
20th Jul 2020, 2:16 AM
Kittu
Kittu - avatar
0
This should be 0, I thinks so
20th Jul 2020, 5:36 AM
Rushikesh Patil
Rushikesh Patil - avatar