+ 5
CHALLENGE : Problem so!ving and efficient code.
(a,b,c) are "triple twins" if ab - c, bc - a, and ca - b are powers of 2. Determine all "triple twins" (a, b, c) of positive integers smaller than N. Try to make your code as efficient as possible to reach the highest possible number in sololearn. Trying all couple if N=1000 means testing 1 billion solutions : you will need to be smarter than this !
64 Answers
+ 1
ha ha
no one yet showed this result
1 3 3
version 5
limit now 350k.....
😂😂😂😂😂
https://code.sololearn.com/c5yb0WU6rxxv/?ref=app
+ 9
Okay, after 30 minutes struggling with C#
(because it's my first C# code :)
I did it:
Here we go:
https://code.sololearn.com/cI8eDDB3spkT/?ref=app
###
Oh, and I have a question:
is (a,b,c) and (a,c,b) considered the same (e.g (2,3,2) and (2,2,3))
###
It was a really good challenge.
+ 5
https://code.sololearn.com/cFA0wl384DdG/?ref=app
+ 5
Yes that was like my solution (a little better though) ... but the best way is :
!( n & n-1 )
+ 5
@sayan, maybe because 1,3,3 is NOT an answer 😂
1*3-3=0 which is not a power of two
+ 3
If there exits an elegant solution instead of brute-forcing it, then the number properties must follow certain rules which satisfy a set of formula/equation.
However it seems I've ventured too far in Google and it leads me to an IMO question. 👀
https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6t79529f6h1112743_find_triples_of_integers
My eyes~~~ ✨💫😫
+ 3
In fact, as the coming from hell link of @Zephyr said, printing all the solutions if n>=11, or just those which a<=n, b<=n and c<=n would be O(1) complexity 😂
+ 2
please do not reveal VCC
let us think the more efficient idea...
DO NOT REVEAL...
JUST WAIT N WAIT N WAIT
PLEASE
+ 2
third version...
it can calculate upto
1350
https://code.sololearn.com/c54ZueajmF50/?ref=app
+ 2
n x n/2 x log2(n)
i goes 1 to n
j goes i to n with 2 gap
k goes log2(n)
the reason i used for j in range(i,n,2)
becauae the triplet will always be
either 3 even numbers
or 3 odd numbers
if its a mixture it wont be a tripple twin
+ 2
Yes, and a big BRAVO for you who were the quickest :p
+ 2
I must confess i used the IMO files to find not easy number problems...
+ 2
And I like your challenges @VcC, I would love to see challenges like that to optimize a function (the powerOfTwo for example) :)
+ 2
For the power of two ... look at the best answer of this post ...
https://www.sololearn.com/discuss/639785/?ref=app
+ 2
Yup @sayan I failed to find the pattern after sketching on paper over 30 mins due to my limited Maths skill and decided to cheat on web. 😲
+ 2
note, one working on jsbin plus not in playground https://code.sololearn.com/Wi3XXgCtgR2g/?ref=app
still is weekend: https://www.sololearn.com/Discuss/635638/?ref?app
+ 2
😂😂☺☺its cool
thats not cheating....u were just knowing.....
+ 2
This solution works also 😂 :
if(n>1){
cout<<"2, 2, 2"<<endl;
if(n>2){
cout<<"2, 2, 3"<<endl;
if(n > 6){
cout<<"3, 5, 7"<<endl;
if(n > 10){
cout<<"2, 6, 11"<<endl;
}
}
}
}