Do you have any questions since you started learning on sololern that are an unanswerable

Question

if yes post and see if any volunteer can attempt it or solve it

Answer 1

Okay...

Well, if there was nothing at all, then something would never arise from that nothing, because there is nothing for anything to come from and there is nothing that would contain that newly found something. Since there is something, then that means something has always existed, but not only something, ALL things in all forms exist already; no such things as time beyond our personal reference of the experience of moments. Weird side effect of experiencing things in a linear fashion, like a movie flipping still images at you. All of the still images already exist but you're only focused on the one which is currently being referenced. But then we come back to the first point... even though all things exist, all things are also nothing at all.

So my question to you Morgan, does this mean that we (me?) are actually the nothingness dreaming of something? Nothingness that realized itself and through that contradiction of itself, ended up creating all things? Or does it mean I was just lonely and in order to make sure I'd never be alone again, I created all of this so that I could experience and exist without being alone forever?

Answer 2

Netkos has derailed and thrown me of track.Im confused

Answer 3

I'm also confused