+ 5
16 Réponses
+ 3
Hello Yasar Khan.
Try posting your code on these topic. It for advertising for free.
https://www.sololearn.com/Discuss/347139/?ref=app
https://www.sololearn.com/Discuss/452626/?ref=app
https://www.sololearn.com/Discuss/454060/?ref=app
https://www.sololearn.com/Discuss/637386/?ref=app
https://www.sololearn.com/Discuss/782037/?ref=app
https://www.sololearn.com/Discuss/833853/?ref=app
https://www.sololearn.com/Discuss/910330/?ref=app
https://www.sololearn.com/Discuss/416138/?ref=app
https://www.sololearn.com/Discuss/878227/?ref=app
+ 2
according to your code..
1900
is must a leap year..
but it not a leap year
+ 1
I'm working on java currently..
but there are so many people..
who gladly help you
like
Alex and so many..
now back to question..
there are called century year
a year which is divisible by 100
is called century year..
a non century which is not divisible by 100
..
leap year..
is that come is 4 year and 400 year at once..
if non century is divisible by 4
if century year divisible by 400
called leap year..
i hope you got
0
these code is not correct
.
what you try to say
0
what is right code?
0
okkk wait i send you
0
what is the level of your programing
0
https://code.sololearn.com/cHOQ85w4GrPi/?ref=app
its level is important..
then learning
0
hey
0
how much programming u know in c++
0
check my one its also give the same answer.
0
can u teach me
0
hmm
0
i will try and upload it
0
Your code recognises 1900, 2100 etc, as leap years. A year that is evenly divisible by 100 (for example, 1900) is a leap year only if it is also evenly divisible by 400.
For this reason, the following years are not leap years:
1700, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2200, 2300, 2500, 2600
This is because they are evenly divisible by 100 but not by 400.
The following years are leap years: 1600, 2000, 2400
This is because they are evenly divisible by both 100 and 400.
You can see my code although it is written in Kotlin but you will get the point.
https://code.sololearn.com/ck3tP7Aq1J20