+ 16
Could someone please tell us what is wrong with this question?😂
11 Réponses
+ 8
Answer will be 1 only!
Did you get it wrong?
Ohhh!! Now I understood what you wanted to say!!
If a person doesn't know that 4 is not less than 3, then also he/she can get the correct answer!
😂😂😂😂😂😂
~ swim ~ Paul Jacobs he is not having a conceptual problem! He is just saying that both the cases will give the same output then what's the point of if else statement
+ 8
~ swim ~ , here is my thought on the matter , please 🙏😂
https://code.sololearn.com/chf655aABoxS/?ref=app
+ 6
Yes, this question is going for else condition as 3 is less than 4 and condition under else will result in 1
+ 5
https://www.sololearn.com/learn/JUMP_LINK__&&__Python__&&__JUMP_LINK/2280/
'and' goes before 'or'. Think that is part of the solution.
+ 4
madeline I think 'or' has more precedence than 'and'
Sonu Kittu
MiKoLa🔥3L17.4L16.2.5k=>L18.🙏IDLE already knows that 😅😅😂😂
See his profile! You will be impressed by his work!
0
Answr will be one just remeber that order of evalution i.e "not and or " order of evaluation
0
☹️☹️☹️☹️☹️
0
This should be 0, I thinks so