+ 1
C++ constructor under various access specifiers
I was asked to "fill in the blanks to declare a class Person with one private member variable age, and a constructor." The words that I unnecessarily capitalized were where the blanks were in the correct answer below. CLASS Person { PRIVATE: int age; PUBLIC: Person(int a) { age = a; }; I've noticed that the constructor is under the public access specifier. Would it be incorrect to switch the third blank (PUBLIC) to private? According to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30995942/do-constructors-always-have-to-be-public constructors can be public, private, protected or default.
1 Réponse
0
Constructor can be private, public, protected also... So use it according to the need..