Does endl and '/n' serve the same purpose?

Answer 1

It's almost the same.. but \n don't automatically flush the stream while endl does... This difference is not always significant in small and simple codes like the ones used in this tutorial but it's something you have to take into account.

Answer 2

(cout << endl;) and (cout << ”\n" << flush;) serve the same purpose.

Answer 3

it's "\n" by the way. Thanks

Answer 4

but endl jumps the cursor and flush te buffer so it's not the same thing

Answer 5

i think think it's no matter but i prefer \n one cz It's a little bit easy.

Answer 6

yes but i think after cin >> u cant add /n u need to type cin << x << endl;

Answer 7

"endl" and "\n" works d same. its Not "/n".

Answer 8

You should prefer "\n" over endl

Answer 9

yes

Answer 10

yes, they are the same if we write endl it's a little bite easier than "\n" bcz it's need double quotation mark.

Answer 11

yes

Answer 12

yes. both moves the cursor to next line.

Answer 13

yes it does

Answer 14

Yes, it does. They both start a new paragraph. For example: cout <<"Hello\nWorld!"; would be the same as cout <<"Hello" <<endl <<World!;

Answer 15

<<endl provides more neat code than \n

Answer 16

(cout << endl;) and (cout << ”\n" << flush;) serve the same purpose.

Answer 17

Yes, but the 'std::endl' is platform-independent. That is, you can use it on windows too, whereas the '\n' would fail, cause '\0' is used on windows.