0

I've found a question in challenges, that I think the answer is wrong, but not sure

I've copied the code just for making the question. In this code, the answer for the challenge was False, but, wouldn't it be True? https://code.sololearn.com/ciphXWUlKZf4/?ref=app

7th Jun 2017, 6:39 PM
Álvaro Estévez López
Álvaro Estévez López - avatar
17 odpowiedzi
+ 6
Thanks. Yea, the question is right but the code is misleading. It stops after checking if it is divisible by 2, by returning false or true. True if its divisible by 2, false otherwise. So, it isn't even really a prime checker. It's more of an even number checker. That looks to me like a fine question except for the fact that it disguises itself as a prime checker. Idk whether or not it's actually a fair question. Would need more opinions.
7th Jun 2017, 7:34 PM
Rrestoring faith
Rrestoring faith - avatar
+ 4
Maybe to imgur? Then post the link. If that's to much of a hastle, don't worry about it. The problem with how this code is, its written so that it returns a value right after the if statements are evaluated. So, it basically only ever tests if the number is divisible by 2. Everything else is false. If you plug in 7, which is a prime, it comes as false. While 8 is true. So the code is written incorrectly. However, the answer of the challenge is still right for what was written in the code.
7th Jun 2017, 7:03 PM
Rrestoring faith
Rrestoring faith - avatar
+ 4
Once the function returns something it stops. As you said "I can see in the for loop 21 % 2 == 0, returns false".. So the for loop never goes to check 21 % 3. It returns false right after checking 2, once returned it's done.
7th Jun 2017, 7:40 PM
Rrestoring faith
Rrestoring faith - avatar
+ 4
Yea the loop won't keep returning more things. I still think this is a bad question, but it isn't wrong on the answer.
7th Jun 2017, 7:44 PM
Rrestoring faith
Rrestoring faith - avatar
+ 3
Without reading a lot of the actual code, the function is named "is_Prime". So, I assume it returns true if the number is a prime. Assuming the function properly determines if the number is a prime, 21 is not a prime. 7 * 3 = 21. So, false. The output in that code also gave false btw.
7th Jun 2017, 6:52 PM
Rrestoring faith
Rrestoring faith - avatar
+ 3
Strange, can I see a screen shot of the challenge question by any chance?
7th Jun 2017, 6:56 PM
Rrestoring faith
Rrestoring faith - avatar
+ 1
I think it could be fixed like this: https://code.sololearn.com/cY4Uqnop4Cn4/?ref=app
7th Jun 2017, 7:40 PM
Álvaro Estévez López
Álvaro Estévez López - avatar
+ 1
Thanks, I'm not English so I don't understand some sentences. But yes, the answer is correct though it is not a very well functional code
7th Jun 2017, 7:51 PM
Álvaro Estévez López
Álvaro Estévez López - avatar
0
I think he would have to change the positions of True and False
7th Jun 2017, 6:41 PM
Álvaro Estévez López
Álvaro Estévez López - avatar
0
I though so, and answered false because 21 is not a prime number. But the code 'says' in words: if the number is divisible by another, it is prime. That's not true
7th Jun 2017, 6:54 PM
Álvaro Estévez López
Álvaro Estévez López - avatar
0
Sure, how can I upload a picture?
7th Jun 2017, 7:00 PM
Álvaro Estévez López
Álvaro Estévez López - avatar
7th Jun 2017, 7:28 PM
Álvaro Estévez López
Álvaro Estévez López - avatar
0
In that picture you can see I answered correctly because I though the code was written correctly. 21 is not prime, so answer should be False. But. Reading the code I can see in the for loop: if 21 % 2 == 0 (which is false), ok, it returns false, but then it checks if 21 % 3 == 0 (true) so it should print True. 21 is not prime, but it prints True. What? It also return True or False every time in the loop. So it'll print: False True False False False True False etc...
7th Jun 2017, 7:33 PM
Álvaro Estévez López
Álvaro Estévez López - avatar
0
Oh, really? So if in the middle of a loop I put return something, it stops right after returning it?
7th Jun 2017, 7:43 PM
Álvaro Estévez López
Álvaro Estévez López - avatar
0
Oh
7th Jun 2017, 7:50 PM
Álvaro Estévez López
Álvaro Estévez López - avatar
0
Okay
7th Jun 2017, 7:50 PM
Álvaro Estévez López
Álvaro Estévez López - avatar
0
Now I understand it
7th Jun 2017, 7:50 PM
Álvaro Estévez López
Álvaro Estévez López - avatar