+ 1
c++ variable declaration
int a, b; is it always the address of a < the address of b (&a < &b) or it depends on the compiler?
3 Respostas
+ 6
Martin Taylor
The memory addresses thats assigned to variable is not during compile time. its done by os.
seems like you are talking about relative addressing while i am saying about absolute addressing in virtual memory
have a look at this .
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48969644/is-the-address-of-a-variable-in-c-the-real-address-in-the-ram-of-the-computer/48970674
+ 4
thank you Martin Taylor for correcting me :) really well explained.
Initially i said that because i tested a piece of code simple one like this
int v;
printf("%d",&v);
compiling this thing on windows always gives a particular value . no matter when its ran . which means addresses are compiler generated .. but then i compiled same piece for linux , it always gave random values on each ram . so i thought that its decided by os . now i get it that the relative positioning of it wont change .
Thank you very much for clearing the ambiguity .
+ 3
its not necessary for the declaration to have accupied successive blocks.
its more dependent of os rather than compiler to allocate memory .
and for arrays its guranteed that memory is contagious but thats not the case for variables .