+ 6

Tie-breaker is not good. It gives a added advantage to second person.

I lost many challenges mainly due to tie-breaker (6th question). Instead their should be better mechanism such as 1. Winner with less time taken overall wins OR 2. 6th question being asked to challenge starter too. then break on time if again tie OR 3. 6th question with multi answer or written answer. better answer wins. or suggest any other options..

12th Nov 2016, 4:37 PM
Aditya Gungaliya
10 Respostas
+ 5
I agree with you. But as for me, Sololearn challenges are useful only on the initial stage of studying. If you answer most of the questions (5 out of 5) most of the time - it is time to move forward and try something else (codewars, freecodecamp, etc.)
12th Nov 2016, 5:10 PM
yugor
+ 2
challenge difficulty level should increase with no. of wins or level
13th Nov 2016, 3:57 AM
Aditya Gungaliya
+ 2
I support 1st one.
17th Sep 2017, 9:32 AM
Dragon Slayer Xavier
Dragon Slayer Xavier - avatar
+ 1
any suggestions
27th Nov 2016, 2:42 PM
Aditya Gungaliya
+ 1
It's not just an advantage it's also a disadvantage. Win or lose is based on the challenged getting it right or wrong. I've lost several where I missed the tiebreaker question.
29th Nov 2016, 6:01 PM
Mark McGhee
Mark McGhee - avatar
+ 1
@Mark, My ratio of losing due to tie-breaker is four times winning. I believe it is advantage
3rd Dec 2016, 6:00 AM
Aditya Gungaliya
+ 1
can you help me nancy brown to learn c++
27th Dec 2016, 10:16 PM
Mohamed Almokhtar
0
hi Nancy could you please provide your email id, I have a few doubts to get clarified.
12th Jan 2017, 3:28 PM
Suresh Karthik
Suresh Karthik - avatar
0
can you send me a message in whatsapp +2120601571213
17th Feb 2017, 11:32 PM
ŰŹÙˆŰ§ŰŻ ŰșŰ±ÙˆŰŻÙŠ
ŰŹÙˆŰ§ŰŻ ŰșŰ±ÙˆŰŻÙŠ - avatar