+ 1
Shared_ptr with array
Hi all Why p2 being int array is allocating same size as of int? Should it not allocate 24*5 = 120? https://code.sololearn.com/c0tdy0fXUAOb/?ref=app
4 Respuestas
+ 2
"std::make_shared ()" doesn't use your implementation of "new" operator to allocate the storage for the object, it instead uses global placement new operator ( which can't be overloaded )
The place where your "new" is being used is to allocate memory ( 24 in this case ) to store internals like shared_count.
you can confirm this by making shared ptr for different types :
https://code.sololearn.com/ca97KJFS2CKI/?ref=app
--
some useful links :-
1. Placement new : https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/new#Placement_new
2. std::make_shared : https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr/make_shared
+ 2
Ketan Lalcheta yes, if you are working with C++20 ( or above )
make_shared<int[5]> ();
or
make_shared<int[]> (5);
Should work as intended.
+ 1
It's because in your environment, a pointer IS an integer.
To actually allocate the memory, you would have to call ‘new int[5]’
I think they’re both pointers to an int. sizeof(int*) would be the same as sizeof(int**)
0
Okay... So
shared_ptr<int[]> p2 = make_shared<int[5]>();
Is proper to allocate array ?